Audio Technica at2035 vs. Blue Yeti- Easy Comparison

When dealing with audio files or communicating at large gatherings, most individuals prefer to use a microphone. The Blue Yeti and the Audio Technica AT2035 are two of the most popular condenser microphones, especially for vocals and voice reproduction. The Blue Yeti focuses on versatility and practicality, while the Audio-Technica AT2035 focuses on performance and audio quality.

Not only do the microphones produce high-quality sound, but they are in a variety of situations. For example, both microphones can be used for broadcasting, audio recording, and voice recording, among other things. As a result, various factors must be considered before purchasing any microphones.

Fortunately, this article highlights some of the key differences between the two mics. It also explains some of the variations, as well as their benefits and drawbacks. The post also includes a checklist of items to think about while buying mics and the best responses to frequently asked questions. Continue reading to find out which microphone is right for you.

The comparison of the AT2035 and blue Yeti in a tabular form

 AT2035Blue Yeti
WeightApproximately 0.89 lbs. 3.4 lbs.
CapsulesSingle 22mm mic capsuleThree -14mm Blue’s condenser capsules
WarrantyOne yearTwo years 
PriceAround $150Cheaper; costs around $110
Polar patterns CardioidCardioid, omnidirectional, bi-directional, and stereo
Connectivity XLRUSB
ControlsIt lacks a headset volume control and a polar pattern selectorHeadphone volume button and mute button

The similarities between the AT2035 and blue Yeti

audio technica at2035 vs blue yeti
  • Warranty

The warranty period is significant because it allows the user to spot and return damaged mics. Depending on the source, both microphones are protected by a one to two-year guarantee. The best locations to get these mics are Amazon.com and Ebay.com. You can place an order and have it delivered to you.

  • An approaching sound

The Blue Yeti and the AT2035 are both high-sensitivity microphones. They are soundproof in all directions except frontal, making them ideal for talking about specific user applications. The Blue Yeti is unique in that it comes with several audio settings that allow users to tweak the sound quality.

The differences between the Audio Technica AT2035 and Blue Yeti

The differences between the Audio Technica AT2035 and Blue Yeti
  • The quality of the sound

The AT2035 sounds more natural, virtually flat across the frequency range, and readily penetrates the lows and highs compared to the AT2035. The Blue Yeti, on the other hand, is much more sculpted and unmistakably a vocal microphone. As a result, I’ll give the Audio Technica AT2035 the edge because it’s a universal microphone essential for various purposes. It’s never a bad idea to have some mid-range presence.

  • Capsules for microphones

Three -14mm Blue’s condenser capsules are included in the Blue Yeti, allowing the microphone to produce a range of polar patterns. The AT2035, on the other hand, has a single 22mm mic capsule, which is a little under an inch in diameter. Unfortunately, neither company gives any information about the capsule’s manufacturing or material composition. 

The Yeti has three tablets, but the AT2035 has a larger one, resulting in a more responsive low-frequency response. The ability to generate varied polar patterns is the main benefit of these capsules.

  • Controls

The front panel of the Blue Yeti has a headphone volume control and a handy touch to a mute button that allows you to silence your broadcast when streaming or vlogging live quickly. Due to the lack of headphone output, the AT2035 lacks a headset volume control and polar pattern selector. Alternatively, a low-cut filter or a pad toggle may have been there in the Yeti.

  • Weight

The Blue Yeti weighs 3.4 pounds in total. The removable stand contributes 2.2 pounds to the overall weight, but it’s still rather hefty. The AT2035 is a lot lighter than the AT2035. It is around 0.89 pounds in weight.

  • Price

The Blue Yeti costs roughly $110, which is affordable considering its four polar designs, a stand, and USB connectivity. The AT2035, on the other hand, costs approximately $150. The Blue Yeti is a better value because the AT2035 requires an additional interface, XLR connector, and mic stand.

  • Polarization patterns

The Blue Yeti is afour-pattern condenser microphone with cardioid, omnidirectional, bi-directional, and stereo polar patterns. As a result, the Yeti can do everything you’d expect from a multi-pattern microphone, making it highly versatile. On the other side, the Audio Technica AT2035 is a cardioid-only microphone.

Advantages of AT2035

  • A shock mount is incorporated for better acoustic isolation. A low-cut filter is also included.
  • Use a low-cut filter.
  • A -10dB pad is used for loud sound generators.

Disadvantages

  • An interface, an XLR cable, and a microphone stand are all required.
  • Headphones do not have an audio output.

Blue Yeti’s Advantages

  • There are four polar patterns.
  • There is a desktop stand included.
  • A USB device that is ready to use right now.
  • It’s ideal for audio recording.

Disadvantages

  • It’s not very versatile if you want to record something other than voice.
  • It’s a bit thick and heavy.

The AT2035 with Blue Yeti Buyer’s Guide

The AT2035 with Blue Yeti Buyer's Guide

When picking which microphone to buy, keep the following factors in mind.

  • Cost

Purchase a microphone that is both inexpensive and of high quality. Compare the prices of the two machines before placing an order; the AT2035 is less expensive, but it lacks critical additional features, such as controls.

  • Intensity

Choose the most appropriate sort of basic design for your needs. Consider that employing a less direct mic closer to the noise source is often preferable to using the highest sound quality from afar. See the microphone options in detail for further information.

  • Audio quality

Consider the device’s ability to make a complicated sound. Choose a machine with crystal-clear, high-quality sound. The sound should be both smooth and loud enough to be heard by everyone. When buying a microphone, compare the two and put them to the test right away before deciding which one to buy.

You might be interested to read also our another comprehensive article of:

Compare Between Audio Technica at2020 vs. Blue Yeti and Audio Technica at2020 vs. At2035– Which One to Pick First?

Frequently asked questions:

  • Is the AT2035 better than the Blue Yeti?

Given the lower price of the Yeti and the fact that the AT2035 necessitates the purchase of an interface, XLR cable, and microphone stand, the Blue Yeti is the special deal.

Conclusion

The functionality and price of a microphone are factors to consider when purchasing one. The quality and price of a feature are linked to the product’s pricing and features. Compared to the AT2035, the Blue Yeti has four polar pattern possibilities, making it a better value for money. The AT2035 outperforms the Blue Yeti in cardioid mode, giving it a better choice for streaming and podcasts.

Finally, before purchasing a microphone, keep the following in mind: Consider the cost and quality of the equipment. Also, think about the advanced characteristics of each microphone and choose the most advanced.

Leave a Comment