Audio Technica atr2100 vs Blue Yeti – Which One Is the Best?

All microphones in the market today have different models that you can easily note when purchasing them. The microphones have a different appearance that brings their differences. In this case, we have ATR 2100 and Blue Yeti microphones with USB microphones that are good for us.

When starting the podcasting, consider using the ATR 2100 USB microphone, but if you have the Blue Yeti, continue using it since it is also good. So, what is the difference between the two? The difference with the two microphones comes in where they have different features like, for example, the ATR has the output options of either USB or XLR.

This article includes the main differences between these two types of microphones and also the main similarities. You will also find answers to some of the frequently asked questions. Follow the article keenly to get every detail on the similarities and differences.

A quick comparison table between Audio Technica atr2100 and blue yeti

comparisonAudio Technica ATR2100Blue Yeti
The polar patterncardioidBidirectional, cardioid, omnidirectional, stereo
Size and WeightLight and slimEasily portableBigger than Audio Technica and heavierPortable but not suitable
Sound qualityHas a dynamic microphoneHas a capacitor microphone.

Differences between Audio Technica atr2100 and Blue Yeti

Audio Technica atr2100 vs Blue Yeti
  • Size and weight

If you want a handheld microphone, the Audio Technica ATR 2100 is the best in that case. It is smaller since its dimensions are 51mm wide, 183mm long with 268 grams of weight. The microphone has a stand and clamp that helps you place it on the bench without it falling.  

On the other hand, Blue yeti seems shorter but heavier since it has a table stand that connects to it. The dimensions it has are 12cm long by 12 cm wide by 29cm high. The microphone is easy to use since you can adjust it at any position.  Blue Yeti is quite portable, allowing you to move it around your studio room with relative ease.

It is not, however, particularly ideal for a vacation or travel in general. It is significantly larger and heavier. It will take up a significant amount of space in your backpack because of the integrated stand’s large size and weight. This microphone is better suited for use in a recording studio.

  • The polar pattern

Audio Technica ATR2100  is good for music and field recording, whereby the audio Technica comes with a cardioid polar model. The model is good for capturing sounds from one direction, either in the front of the slag environmental noise from other directions. Its cardioid polar pattern is the only limitation of the Audio Technica ATR2100 – which isn’t a big deal because cardioid is the most widely utilized polar pattern for a variety of applications.

In addition to cardioid, omnidirectional, bidirectional, and stereo polar patterns, Blue Yeti also includes four customizable polar patterns. You can therefore adjust to a variety of recording situations using Blue Yeti. In interviews, the bidirectional pattern comes in handy, and the stereo pattern comes in handy when you wish to record a stereo track. However, in most situations, you will choose to employ a cardioid pattern.

  • Sound quality

Audio Technica ATR 2100 is a dynamic microphone that has a good ability to reject noise, and it is also more durable.  When using the microphones, choose ATR 2100 since it has good field entry features and good sound quality. The sound is clear and accurate.

On the other hand, Blue Yeti has a capacitor microphone that makes it very sensitive to require good room environmental noise. The overall sound is good, bright, crisp and accurate, which allows them to catch more high- and low-end frequencies.

Similarities between Audio Technica atr2100 and Blue Yeti

Similarities between Audio Technica atr2100 and Blue Yeti

i. They both have a cardioid polar pattern or pickup pattern

ii. They have the same bit depth of 16 bits

iii. They both have a mic stand when purchasing

iv. Both microphones are too sensitive

v. They can both be used in field and studio recording

 Audio technica atr2100


i. Suitable for both field recording and studio recording

ii. It is versatile

iii. It has an excellent quality of sound

iv. It is easy to use as you plug and play

v. It cancels the background noise

vi. It is usually very sturdy


i. The LED light does not go off after switching off the computer

ii.  Its stand is somehow flimsy

iii. It lacks a turn-off button

Strengths of a Blue Yeti

1. Reasonably priced

Without a doubt, the Yeti mic delivers excellent sound quality and value for money.

2. Versatile

The Blue Yeti’s “Tri-capsule array” (three condenser capsules) allows you to record in virtually any situation with any polar pattern.

3. Quiet spaces abound

If you record in a quiet area, the mic will produce high-quality audio.

4. Has essential recording features

Yeti comes with a gain dial, volume button, polar pattern switch, and mute button.

Weaknesses of a Blue Yeti

1) Pricey accessories

It arrives with a desk stand; however, it doesn’t perfectly position the microphone. Additions like a separate stand or shock mounts will cost extra money.

2) Not easily portable

This is a USB streaming speaker so that a USB cable will be needed.

3) One mic tethered

To use a Yeti microphone properly, you need only one head.

4) Very sensitive

If you bang on the table or use a keyboard, the microphone may pick up undesirable noises. To solve the issue, you can use a shock mounting and a broadcast boom arm.

You might be interested to read also our another comprehensive article of:

Compare Between Audio Technica at2020 vs. Blue Yeti and Audio Technica at2020 vs. Rode Nt1a– Pick the Best One

Frequently Asked Questions:

  • What makes ATR 2100 more versatile?

ATR 2100 is more versatile with the output options since it has the USB and XLR output options, making it great for mobile settings and studio environments.


The article compares the ATR 2100 and Blue Yeti where they have some similarities since they have almost the same function at home.  The two microphones both have USB microphones, which are good for use mainly by podcasters. Now you have the features of the two microphones above that you can use. ATR 2100 is good for use when you start podcasting, but if you already have the Blue Yeti microphone, you can stick to it.

The two microphones are good in that they produce good sounds when recording but choosing them depends on your preference. The Blue Yeti produces quality sounds as you compare to the ATR 2100.  If you are stuck between choosing the best microphones to use, consider checking your needs and goals.

Leave a Comment