Audio Technica atr2500 vs Blue Yeti-Which Is Better?

Choosing the right USB to at home when playing music is not an easy task to get a device that well fits their needs. Picking up the wrong device can cause a mess at home when using it. Therefore it is good to choose the right device by knowing their differences. However many people do not know the differences.

For beginners it is good to choose using the blue yeti since it works better and you can easily identify from a distance. With its versatility, the Blue Yeti can record voice overs and music without a complex setup. ATR 2500 is also good for use.

This article includes the main differences between these two types of microphones and also the main similarities. You will also find answers to some of the frequently asked questions. Follow the article keenly to get every detail on the similarities and differences.

A quick comparison table between Audio Technica atr2500 and blue yeti

comparisonAudio Technica ATR2500Blue Yeti
The polar patterncardioidBidirectional, cardioid, omnidirectional, stereo
Bit depth1616 bit
The sample rate48kHz/44.1kHz48kHz
Frequency response30 to 15000 Hz20Hz to 20kHz
ElementCondenserPressure gradient, condenser
FeaturesIt lacks a mute buttonLacks a gain controlIt has a mute buttonHas a gain control
UsesBest for home studio and field recordingBest for vocals, interviews, field recording, and conference calls.
Size and WeightLight and slimEasily portableBigger than Audio Technica and heavierPortable but not suitable

Differences between Audio Technica atr2500 and Blue Yeti

Audio Technica atr2500 vs Blue Yeti
  • Size and weight

If you’re looking for a portable USB microphone that you can take on any trip or travel with you, the Audio Technica ATR2500 is a better choice. This microphone has a substantially thinner and lighter body than the previous model. It features a straightforward tubular design and it features a collapsible stand that is both lightweight and convenient. Everything that you will need to operate with this microphone may be easily stowed away in your bag. 

In contrast, the Blue Yeti is quite portable, allowing you to move it around your studio room with relative ease. It is not, however, particularly ideal for a vacation or travel in general. It is significantly larger and heavier. It will take up a significant amount of space in your backpack because of the integrated stand’s large size and weight. This microphone is better suited for use in a recording studio.

  • The polar pattern

Audio Technica ATR2500 and Blue Yeti are both microphones that are used for side-addressing purposes. To put it another way, you communicate into the side of the microphone rather than the top of the microphone. Their polar patterns, on the other hand, differ from one another. Its cardioid polar pattern is the only limitation of the Audio Technica ATR2500 – which isn’t a big deal because cardioid is the most widely utilized polar pattern for a variety of applications.

In addition to cardioid, omnidirectional, bidirectional, and stereo polar patterns, Blue Yeti also includes four customizable polar patterns. You can therefore adjust to a variety of recording situations using Blue Yeti. In interviews, the bidirectional pattern comes in handy, and the stereo pattern comes in handy when you wish to record a stereo track. However, in most situations, you will choose to employ a cardioid pattern.

  • Sound quality

Both the Audio Technica ATR2500 and the Blue Yeti record at 16 bits/48 kHz. In general, they both have pleasant tones. They are capable of capturing audio with exceptional precision, clarity, and detail. Although the Audio Technica ATR2500 has a lower self-noise output, the Blue Yeti is not significantly inferior. On the other hand, Blue Yeti has a broader frequency response range, which allows them to catch more high- and low-end frequencies.

Similarities between Audio Technica atr2500 and Blue Yeti

Similarities between Audio Technica atr2500 and Blue Yeti

i. They both have a cardioid polar pattern or pickup pattern

ii. They have the same bit depth of 16 bits

iii. They both have a mic stand when purchasing

iv. Both microphones are too sensitive

v. They can both be used in field and studio recording

Pros of Audio technica atr2500

i. It has an excellent quality of sound

ii. It is easy to use as you plug and play

iii. It cancels the background noise

iv. It is usually very sturdy

Weaknesses of Audio Technica atr2500

i. The LED light does not go off after switching off the computer

ii. Its stand is somehow flimsy

iii. It lacks a turn-off button

Strengths of a Blue Yeti

1. Reasonably priced

Without a doubt, the Yeti mic delivers excellent sound quality and value for money.

2. Versatile

The Blue Yeti’s “Tri-capsule array” (three condenser capsules) allows you to record in virtually any situation with any polar pattern.

3. Quiet spaces abound

If you record in a quiet area, the mic will produce high-quality audio.

4. Has essential recording features

Yeti comes with a gain dial, volume button, polar pattern switch, and mute button.

Weaknesses of a Blue Yeti

1) Pricey accessories

It arrives with a desk stand; however, it doesn’t perfectly position the microphone. Additions like a separate stand or shock mounts will cost extra money.

2) Not easily portable

This is a USB streaming speaker, so that a USB cable will be needed.

3) One mic tethered

To use a Yeti microphone properly, you need only one head.

4) Very sensitive

If you bang on the table or use a keyboard, the microphone may pick up undesirable noises. To solve the issue, you can use a shock mounting and a broadcast boom arm.

You might be interested to read also our another comprehensive article of:

Audio Technica atr2500 vs At2020- (Which One Is Better?) and Audio Technica atr2100 vs Blue Yeti – Which One Is the Best?

Frequently Asked Questions:

  • What is the use of the condenser in the Audio Technica atr2500?

Answer; The ATR2500-USB, which is advertised as being great for podcasts, home studio work, and voiceovers, looks to be a microphone specifically designed for voice projects.


Now you have the features of the two microphones above that you can use. I recommend using blue yeti for the recordings since it has the polar motifs feature that makes it unique from the other one. The mute and gain controls are pretty helpful. The audio quality is comparable to ATR2500. It has a broader frequency response range so that it can record more highs and lows. Both the bidirectional and stereo patterns work well for interviews and creating stereo tracks.

In other words the blue yeti has it extra ordinary features that make it good for use. The different polar patterns allow for clear sound recording. That allows you to distinguish multiple voices around a podium clearly. It captures the sound loudly and clearly, while Cardioid and Bidirectional patterns produce pleasingly precise recordings.

Leave a Comment